Have you been involved in an accident? Please contact us immediately for a FREE CONSULTATION
Rideshare services such as Uber and Lyft have transformed how people travel across Philadelphia, offering quick, affordable transportation from Center City to Fishtown, Manayunk, and University City. But as rideshare vehicles multiply on local roads, serious accidents involving passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and other motorists have become increasingly common.
Unlike traditional car crashes, rideshare collisions present unique challenges. Multiple insurance policies may apply depending on the driver's app status. Questions about employment classification complicate who bears responsibility. Corporate policies designed to limit liability can prevent injured people from receiving fair compensation.
The personal injury attorneys at Edelstein Martin & Nelson understand these complexities. With decades of experience representing injured Philadelphians, the firm helps clients hold negligent rideshare drivers and companies accountable. Whether a crash occurred on I-76, Roosevelt Boulevard, or the busy streets near Temple University, the firm pursues maximum recovery for every client.
Drivers operate as independent contractors under Pennsylvania's Transportation Network Company (TNC) laws, meaning Uber and Lyft often deny direct responsibility for crashes. Insurance coverage varies based on driver status, making it difficult to pursue compensation without legal guidance.
When a driver is logged into the app but has not accepted a ride, the rideshare company provides only limited liability coverage. Once the driver receives a fare or has a passenger in the vehicle, a $1 million commercial policy may apply. Edelstein Martin & Nelson meticulously investigates each case to determine which coverage period applies and how to trigger the highest available limits.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we are deeply familiar with the local risks that affect our clients. We leverage this knowledge to craft targeted legal strategies tailored to each case. With extensive experience litigating complex injury cases before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, we provide our clients with a distinct advantage in their pursuit of justice..
Pennsylvania Act 164 requires rideshare drivers to maintain insurance coverage that varies based on their status:
Offline (personal use): Only the driver's personal auto policy applies.
App On, Waiting for a Ride: The rideshare company must provide at least $50,000 per person, $100,000 per accident, and $25,000 for property damage.
Accepted Trip or Passenger Onboard: Uber and Lyft are required to provide $1 million in third-party liability coverage.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we recognize that Philadelphia's busy streets present constant hazards for rideshare drivers and passengers alike. Our firm understands the common accident scenarios that frequently occur, including rear-end collisions, T-bone crashes, and dooring accidents. We are acutely aware that the unique conditions of our urban environment contribute to these risks, such as distracted drivers focusing on GPS or app notifications leading to rear-end incidents. With our experience, we are committed to advocating for those affected by these unfortunate events.
If a victim is found more than 50 percent at fault, they cannot recover damages. Because rideshare crashes often occur in chaotic traffic environments, such as Roosevelt Boulevard or the Schuylkill Expressway, insurers may try to argue shared fault to reduce payouts.
At our firm, Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we counter these claims by utilizing police reports, traffic camera footage, and expert accident reconstruction testimony. This approach allows us to demonstrate how the collision occurred clearly.
Philadelphia's urban environment creates specific risks:
Rear-end collisions: Often caused by distracted drivers watching GPS or app notifications.
T-bone and side-impact crashes: Common at intersections like Broad & Girard or 52nd & Market.
Dooring accidents: When a passenger exits suddenly into a bike lane or oncoming traffic on Walnut or Chestnut Street.
These accidents can result in severe injuries such as fractures, traumatic brain injuries, or spinal cord damage. The firm's attorneys work closely with medical professionals to document every aspect of the harm caused, ensuring no loss, current or future, is overlooked.
Rideshare vehicles operate throughout the region:
Highway accidents: High-speed crashes along I-95, I-476 (Blue Route), and U.S. 1 (Lincoln Highway).
Airport-related incidents: Collisions near Terminal C of Philadelphia International Airport.
Multi-county crashes: Accidents involving Uber and Lyft drivers traveling between Bucks, Montgomery, and Delaware Counties.
At our firm, Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we routinely handle multi-jurisdictional claims involving drivers, passengers, and pedestrians throughout Southeastern Pennsylvania. Our broad regional reach enables us to manage every aspect of a case, from local police reports to federal transportation regulations, ensuring that our clients receive comprehensive support and representation.
The moments after a rideshare collision are critical. Victims should take photographs of the vehicles, roadway, and any visible injuries. In Philadelphia, police reports can later be obtained from the Accident Investigation District located at 26th & Master Streets. The firm advises clients to keep copies of all reports and medical records to support their future claim.
Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 5524, victims generally have two years from the date of the crash to file a personal injury claim. Waiting too long can jeopardize the ability to recover compensation.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson immediately works to secure time-sensitive evidence before it can be deleted or altered by the rideshare company. This includes preserving crucial digital evidence such as GPS data, trip logs, and app status information.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson's investigative process includes:
Digital evidence collection: Working with accident reconstruction specialists to analyze vehicle damage, speed, and road conditions.
Electronic records: Reviewing cellphone data, GPS logs, and traffic camera footage from intersections such as Broad & Spring Garden.
Company records: Obtaining driver history, maintenance logs, and prior complaint reports.
These steps are critical for determining whether the rideshare company's $1 million policy applies and for identifying any additional negligent parties, such as another motorist or a vehicle maintenance provider.
At our firm, we understand that victims of rideshare collisions often endure long-lasting injuries and financial difficulties. We are committed to meticulously documenting both the economic and non-economic losses our clients experience to ensure they receive the compensation they deserve.
Compensation may include:
When necessary, Edelstein Martin & Nelson presents expert testimony before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas to demonstrate the full scope of their client's damages. Their history of achieving strong settlements and verdicts across Pennsylvania gives clients confidence that every legal option will be pursued.
At our firm, we understand that effective claims hinge on clear evidence, accurate liability determination, and skilled negotiation with insurance companies. Our experienced attorneys are here to guide you through every procedural stage of Pennsylvania civil law, ensuring that you receive the support and expertise you need.
Once a client contacts Edelstein Martin & Nelson, the legal team begins by securing critical records and evidence. This includes the Uber or Lyft trip data, electronic communications between driver and passenger, dashcam or traffic camera footage, and the official Philadelphia Police crash report.
Investigators also gather medical records and consult accident reconstruction experts when fault is disputed. This early phase is crucial for preserving key digital evidence before rideshare companies can alter or remove access to it.
At our firm, we understand that rideshare accidents in Philadelphia can lead to serious and complex legal challenges. Our team of Philadelphia rideshare accident lawyers is committed to helping victims navigate these unique situations, as we are well-versed in the intricacies of rideshare liability.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, our team understands that determining fault often involves analyzing the driver’s activity within the app, and we are prepared to advocate for our clients in these difficult circumstances. With our extensive experience, we will thoroughly investigate each case to ensure our clients receive the compensation they deserve, regardless of the complexity.
The next stage involves identifying which insurance policies apply to the crash. There may be multiple overlapping policies: the driver's personal plan, Uber or Lyft's contingent liability coverage, and potentially uninsured or underinsured motorist protection.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson attorneys ensure all available benefits are pursued, including medical coverage under Personal Injury Protection (PIP).
Having handled thousands of personal injury and auto accident cases across Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, Edelstein Martin & Nelson's attorneys are adept at countering lowball settlement tactics and pursuing fair compensation through aggressive negotiation.
If insurers do not provide an equitable resolution, our firm is fully prepared to take the matter to trial. We have a successful history of litigating rideshare and auto-injury cases in Philadelphia County civil court.
Their comprehensive trial preparation, including expert testimony, demonstrative exhibits, and detailed economic analyses, ensures clients are positioned for the strongest possible result.
Victims are entitled to receive compensation for both economic and non-economic damages, which can encompass short- and long-term losses. The amount of compensation awarded typically hinges on the severity of the injuries sustained and the available evidence of liability.
Pennsylvania courts take into account supporting documentation, bills, pay stubs, and expert economic projections when calculating these losses.
Non-economic damages refer to the physical and emotional impact of an accident. In Pennsylvania, individuals can elect full tort, which allows them to pursue a broader range of recovery for their injuries.
These damages include:
Clients who choose full tort coverage or experience a serious injury under state law can seek complete compensation beyond just medical expenses.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we have proudly represented Philadelphia families who have endured devastating losses on our local roads, including Roosevelt Boulevard, the Schuylkill Expressway (I-76), and Delaware Avenue. We are committed to ensuring accountability for negligent rideshare drivers and corporate defendants, standing by our clients every step of the way.
Uber and Lyft frequently argue that they are technology platforms rather than transportation providers, distancing themselves from direct responsibility. However, Pennsylvania courts may consider the extent of a company's control over drivers, app data, and customer interactions when evaluating negligence.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson counters these defenses with evidence showing how corporate policies, pressure to accept rides, or app-based distractions contribute to unsafe driving behavior.
Defendants often attempt to shift blame to reduce their financial liability. The firm's attorneys analyze accident reconstruction data and eyewitness accounts to refute unfounded comparative fault claims.
At our firm, we recognize that a common challenge arises when insurers delay or reject claims on procedural grounds. We are committed to holding insurers accountable for bad-faith handling of these claims.g
Edelstein Martin & Nelson's deep familiarity with the Pennsylvania Insurance Department's Fair Claims Practices regulations allows them to pursue penalties when justified.
Rideshare collisions often involve digital evidence: GPS coordinates, speed data, and phone usage logs. Expert accident reconstructionists use this data to recreate crash sequences and confirm liability.
In cases involving intersections such as Spring Garden Street and Broad Street or Market and 15th, digital mapping helps visualize fault for juries and insurers alike.
Medical experts testify about spinal injuries, concussions, or orthopedic trauma, while economic specialists calculate the financial impact of permanent disabilities. These expert evaluations ensure the firm presents a fully substantiated damages profile for every client.
Founded in Philadelphia, Edelstein Martin & Nelson has built its reputation on achieving substantial verdicts and settlements for injured clients throughout Pennsylvania. The firm's attorneys have appeared before courts in Philadelphia, Montgomery, and Delaware Counties, securing compensation for complex rideshare and auto injury claims.
Unlike national firms, our attorneys at team of attorneys at Edelstein Martin & Nelson understands the specific challenges of Philadelphia traffic, from congestion on I-95 and Roosevelt Boulevard to the dangers at Kelly Drive and Girard Avenue intersections.
This hands-on approach ensures clients remain informed, supported, and empowered throughout the legal process. It reflects the firm's longstanding dedication to protecting Philadelphia residents and families after serious injuries.
When a passenger is injured while riding in an Uber or Lyft, they typically do not fault the driver causing the collision. This positions them favorably under Pennsylvania law. However, determining which insurance policy provides coverage can become complicated when multiple vehicles are involved.
For example, if an Uber carrying a passenger gets rear-ended by another driver on I-76, both the rideshare company's $1 million policy and the at-fault driver's personal insurance may apply. Edelstein Martin & Nelson's attorneys understand how to navigate these overlapping claims to maximize total recovery.
Rideshare passengers often suffer particularly severe injuries because they may not anticipate sudden stops, sharp turns, or collisions. Unlike drivers who can brace for impact, passengers, especially those in the back seat, are vulnerable to:
Our firm works with psychologists and trauma specialists to document the full emotional impact of these accidents, ensuring that non-economic damages reflect the actual harm suffered.
Pedestrians and cyclists are especially at risk when rideshare vehicles make sudden stops or turns. In Philadelphia, the presence of bike lanes alongside crowded sidewalks contributes to numerous conflict points, increasing the potential for accidents.
Rideshare drivers often focus on their app navigation rather than on surrounding traffic. This distraction leads to dangerous situations for pedestrians crossing at busy intersections like 15th & Chestnut or cyclists traveling along Spruce Street's protected bike lanes.
When pedestrians or cyclists are struck by rideshare vehicles, injuries tend to be catastrophic. Edelstein Martin & Nelson has represented victims who suffered broken bones, internal injuries, and permanent disabilities after being hit by distracted Uber and Lyft drivers throughout Philadelphia.
Pennsylvania law generally favors pedestrians in crosswalks and cyclists using designated bike lanes. However, insurance companies often attempt to blame vulnerable road users for their own injuries.
Our firm counters these arguments by:
At our firm, we believe that a thorough approach is essential in establishing clear liability. This not only ensures that justice is served but also protects innocent victims from having blame unjustly placed on them by insurers.
Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 5524(2), injury victims have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit. This may seem like ample time, but investigations, medical treatment, and negotiations often consume months before a victim realizes that a settlement is not forthcoming.
Waiting too long creates several risks:
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we strongly encourage our clients to contact an attorney immediately after a rideshare accident. By engaging with us early, you can help preserve crucial evidence and ensure all necessary procedural deadlines are met. We're here to support you through this process.
If a rideshare accident involves a government vehicle, such as a SEPTA bus or city-owned maintenance truck, even shorter deadlines apply. Under the Pennsylvania Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act, victims must provide written notice within six months of the incident.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, our firm's attorneys are well-versed in these accelerated timelines and ensure that all required notices are properly filed to protect client rights.
When you contact the firm, you can expect a thorough, compassionate review of your situation. The attorney will ask about the circumstances of the crash, your injuries, and the treatment you have received. They will also explain:
This initial consultation provides clarity and peace of mind during what is often a confusing and stressful time. Clients leave with a clear understanding of their options and a plan for moving forward.
One of the most contentious issues in rideshare accident claims is identifying which insurance policy provides coverage. Disputes often arise when the driver's app status at the time of the crash is unclear or disputed.
Uber and Lyft maintain that their commercial policies only apply when drivers have accepted a ride request or have passengers in the vehicle. However, the transition between coverage periods can be murky. For example, if a driver just dropped off a passenger and is pulling away from the curb when a collision occurs, insurers may dispute whether the commercial policy still applies.
These disputes require a detailed investigation into:
Edelstein Martin & Nelson's attorneys subpoena electronic records from rideshare companies and work with digital forensics experts to establish the precise app status at the moment of collision. This thorough approach prevents insurance companies from denying coverage on technical grounds or due to conflicting information.
Personal auto insurers argue that any driving done in connection with rideshare services, even when the app is off, constitutes commercial use that voids coverage. This leaves accident victims in challenging positions when they cannot recover under either their personal policy or the rideshare company's contingent coverage.
Pennsylvania law mandates that policy exclusions be clearly and conspicuously stated to be enforceable. At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, our team of Philadelphia rideshare accident lawyers thoroughly reviews policy terms to assess whether exclusions were adequately disclosed and if they are relevant to the specific circumstances of the accident. When insurers wrongly deny coverage, legal action can be taken to compel them to fulfill their obligations.
Accidents involving multiple vehicles in rideshare situations create specific challenges in determining fault and assigning responsibility. In Pennsylvania, joint and several liability rules may apply when multiple defendants are accountable for a single injury.
Common scenarios include:
When multiple parties share fault, Pennsylvania law allows injured victims to pursue compensation from any or all responsible parties. This is particularly important when one defendant lacks adequate insurance coverage. By identifying all negligent parties, including the rideshare driver, other motorists, and potentially the rideshare company itself, attorneys maximize available recovery sources.
Contribution claims allow one defendant who pays more than their proportionate share of damages to seek reimbursement from other responsible parties. Indemnification claims arise when one party argues that another party should bear the entire financial burden.
For example, suppose a rideshare driver was operating a poorly maintained vehicle provided by a rental company. In that case, the rental company might seek indemnification from the maintenance provider that failed to inspect the brakes properly. These complex relationships require attorneys who understand both liability principles and the strategic implications of multi-party litigation.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson's experience in complex personal injury cases ensures that all potential defendants are identified early and that settlement negotiations account for the entire web of responsibility.
Modern rideshare accidents produce significant electronic evidence that is crucial for establishing liability. Attorneys must act swiftly to preserve this digital evidence before it is lost or becomes unavailable.
Key sources of electronic evidence include:
Modern vehicles, especially those used for commercial purposes, often contain event data recorders (EDRs) or "black boxes" that capture information about the seconds leading up to a crash. This data can confirm or refute claims about speed, braking, and driver inputs.
GPS data becomes particularly important when drivers claim they were not logged into the app at the time of the crash or when passengers dispute the circumstances of the collision. By matching GPS coordinates with traffic camera footage and witness statements, attorneys can create a comprehensive timeline of events.
At our firm, Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we take proactive steps by issuing immediate preservation letters to rideshare companies. We demand that they retain all electronic records related to the trip and the collision, ensuring that vital evidence is not lost. We understand the importance of this matter, as Pennsylvania law imposes severe consequences for destroying evidence. Courts may impose sanctions or draw adverse inferences if parties fail to preserve relevant data, and we are committed to safeguarding our clients' interests throughout this process.
Even when a rideshare driver carries the state minimum insurance, catastrophic injuries can quickly exceed those limits. Similarly, when another motorist causes a collision involving a rideshare vehicle, that motorist's insurance may be insufficient to cover all damages.
In these situations, victims can turn to their own UM/UIM coverage for additional compensation. This coverage is designed to fill the gap between available insurance and actual damages. However, insurance companies often dispute UM/UIM claims, arguing that:
Our firm has extensive experience handling UM/UIM claims, enabling us to navigate these disputes effectively and maximize recovery from all available sources. We specialize in coordinating claims across multiple policies and negotiating with several insurance companies at once to ensure our clients receive the compensation they deserve..
For example, if a victim has three vehicles insured under a single policy with $100,000 in UM/UIM coverage per vehicle, stacking could provide up to $300,000 in coverage. However, stacking is available only if the policyholder specifically elected it when purchasing insurance.
Understanding whether stacking applies requires careful policy review and knowledge of Pennsylvania insurance law. When properly applied, stacked coverage can significantly increase compensation for victims of serious rideshare accidents.
Rideshare accident victims often experience severe psychological trauma along with physical injuries. Pennsylvania law permits recovery for emotional distress, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from collisions.
Common psychological effects include:
These psychological injuries are just as real and compensable as broken bones or spinal injuries. However, proving emotional distress requires expert testimony from psychologists or psychiatrists who can link the symptoms directly to the accident.
Victims should:
Edelstein Martin & Nelson collaborates with trusted mental health professionals throughout the Philadelphia area to effectively document and present evidence of psychological harm. This thorough approach ensures that juries and insurance adjusters fully understand the human costs of rideshare accidents.
If you were injured as a passenger, driver, or pedestrian in an Uber or Lyft accident anywhere in the greater Philadelphia region, you may be entitled to significant financial compensation. Do not navigate the complex rideshare claims process alone.
Contact Edelstein Martin & Nelson at 1-888-630-4409 or submit your information through the firm's secure online consultation form.
An experienced Philadelphia rideshare accident lawyer will review your case, explain your legal options, and help you pursue the justice and compensation you deserve.
Serving clients across Center City, South Philadelphia, West Philadelphia, Germantown, and the Main Line, the firm stands ready to fight for victims of negligence throughout Pennsylvania.
Address
123 S Broad St #1820
Philadelphia, PA 19109
Email: lnelson@law-pa.com
Edelstein Martin & Nelson Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © Copyright | All Rights Reserved.
