Have you been involved in an accident? Please contact us immediately for a FREE CONSULTATION
At our firm, we understand that when a trusted doctor, nurse, or hospital makes a preventable error, the consequences can be devastating. Edelstein Martin & Nelson is dedicated to providing experienced representation for victims of medical negligence throughout Philadelphia and the surrounding counties.
Our team of Philadelphia medical malpractice lawyers recognizes that patients and families from Center City to Fishtown, South Philly to the Main Line depend on healthcare providers to deliver competent, careful treatment. When that trust is broken through negligence, victims not only endure physical harm but also face emotional trauma and financial hardship.
Our experienced attorneys handle complex medical malpractice cases with precision and compassion, backed by a deep understanding of Pennsylvania's healthcare and legal systems. This approach is essential for holding negligent providers and institutions accountable..
Understanding what constitutes malpractice helps victims recognize when they have valid claims worth pursuing.
Common examples include misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis of serious conditions such as cancer or stroke, surgical errors including wrong-site surgery or anesthesia mistakes, medication and prescription errors, birth injuries resulting in long-term disabilities, and lack of informed consent before procedures.
These cases often arise in major medical centers across Philadelphia, including hospitals in University City, Northeast Philadelphia, and along the I-76 corridor. Each type of error requires different evidence and expert testimony to prove negligence occurred.
Pennsylvania law requires that a malpractice plaintiff demonstrate a deviation from the standard of care that directly caused the injury. Under 231 Pa. Code § 1042.3, a Certificate of Merit signed by a qualified medical expert must accompany the complaint, confirming the claim has legitimate medical grounds.
An experienced medical malpractice attorney ensures this step is completed correctly to prevent dismissal. The Certificate of Merit requirement protects healthcare providers from frivolous lawsuits while ensuring legitimate victims can pursue justice.
At our firm, Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we bring decades of combined experience. Our dedicated attorneys specialize in analyzing medical records, consulting with leading medical professionals, and presenting comprehensive evidence before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. We are committed to providing our clients with the highest level of legal representation.
Duty of Care: The first step is establishing that a provider-patient relationship existed. This duty arises when a doctor, nurse, hospital, or healthcare facility agrees to treat or advise a patient. Once that relationship is in place, the provider is legally obligated to deliver care consistent with what a reasonably competent professional in the same specialty would provide under similar circumstances.
For example, a surgeon performing a procedure at Jefferson Health in Center City owes the patient a duty to follow accepted surgical standards, from sterilization and preparation to postoperative monitoring. Proving this duty may involve obtaining appointment logs, treatment agreements, or hospital records confirming that care was provided within a professional capacity.
Breach of Duty: Next, the plaintiff must prove that the healthcare provider failed to meet the accepted standard of care. This breach can occur through action or omission, such as failing to order necessary tests, misreading diagnostic images, or prescribing the wrong medication.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we recognize that establishing a strong case involves proving that the healthcare provider's breach of duty directly caused the injury. We understand that it's not enough to demonstrate negligence simply; we must connect that breach to the patient's harm. Our experienced team works diligently to show that, "but for" the provider's error, the damage would not have occurred. This aspect is often the most contested in a malpractice case, and we are committed to collaborating with experts to build a robust argument on behalf of our clients.
Causation: Even if negligence occurred, the plaintiff must connect that breach directly to the injury. It must be shown that the harm would not have happened "but for" the provider's error. This often becomes the most contested part of a malpractice case.
At our firm, we collaborate with specialists who can connect the provider's mistake to specific medical outcomes. For instance, if a delayed diagnosis allowed cancer to progress, or if a medication error resulted in a severe allergic reaction, our expert analysis can clearly demonstrate how the negligence caused the injury.
Damages: Finally, the plaintiff must show measurable harm and economic and non-economic losses resulting from the negligence. These include additional medical expenses for corrective procedures or ongoing care, lost wages or reduced earning capacity due to disability, pain and suffering, and emotional distress.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we understand that proving a strong case requires establishing that the healthcare provider's breach of duty directly resulted in the patient's injury. It’s not sufficient just to demonstrate negligence; we work diligently to connect that breach to the harm suffered by the patient. We recognize that this aspect is often the most contested in malpractice cases, which is why our experienced team collaborates closely with medical experts to build a robust argument that shows, "but for" the provider's error, the harm would not have occurred. We are committed to advocating for our clients' rights and pursuing the justice they deserve.
Under Pennsylvania law, expert testimony is mandatory in virtually all medical malpractice cases. These experts, licensed physicians in the same specialty as the defendant, explain how the provider's conduct fell below accepted standards and how that failure caused injury.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson works with a network of respected medical experts throughout the Philadelphia region and across the state. This collaborative approach enables the firm to present compelling, credible evidence to juries in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas and in nearby county courts.
Understanding these deadlines proves critical to protecting legal rights and preserving evidence.
Under 42 Pa. C.S. § 5524(2), most medical malpractice lawsuits in Pennsylvania must be filed within two years of the date the injury occurred or the date it was reasonably discovered. This means the clock typically starts running when the patient either experiences the negligent act or learns of the injury through subsequent medical evaluation.
Because some medical injuries are not immediately apparent, such as internal surgical mistakes or delayed diagnosis, Pennsylvania recognizes a "discovery rule." This rule allows victims extra time if they could not have reasonably known about the malpractice at the time it occurred.
At our firm, we understand the importance of accurately determining when the statute of limitations begins and ends. We apply the discovery rule meticulously to ensure that our clients' cases are not dismissed due to timing issues.
The discovery rule is vital for cases involving conditions that reveal harm only months or years later. For example, a patient may not realize that a radiologist misread a scan until a more advanced cancer diagnosis is made.
In such cases, the two-year period begins when the patient knew or should have known that the injury was caused by medical negligence, not necessarily when the procedure or misdiagnosis occurred. Attorneys analyze every detail of the timeline to show when discovery reasonably occurred.
In addition to the discovery rule, Pennsylvania enforces a seven-year statute of repose under 40 P.S. § 1303.513(a) of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act. This law bars all medical malpractice lawsuits filed more than seven years after the negligent act, regardless of when the injury was discovered.
There are limited exceptions, such as when a foreign object, like a surgical instrument or sponge, is left in the body. However, for most other claims, the seven-year cap is absolute. This makes early investigation and filing essential.
Pennsylvania law provides special protection for minors. The statute of limitations does not begin to run until the child turns 18, giving them until their 20th birthday to file suit. For mentally incapacitated adults, courts may also "toll" the statute until the victim is capable of understanding and pursuing legal action.
These provisions ensure that the most vulnerable patients, such as children injured during birth or individuals suffering cognitive impairment, are not denied access to justice.
At our firm, Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we meticulously examine every stage of our patients' care to identify all liable parties involved.
Physicians and Surgeons: Doctors are the most frequently named defendants in medical malpractice lawsuits. A physician may be held liable for misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, surgical errors such as wrong-site surgery or internal injuries, and failure to obtain informed consent before procedures.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we understand that establishing a strong case in a medical malpractice claim requires proving that the healthcare provider's breach of duty directly caused the injury. We recognize that it’s not sufficient to show negligence simply; we diligently work to connect that breach to the patient’s harm. Our experienced team is committed to demonstrating that "but for" the provider’s error, the injury would not have occurred. We are dedicated to collaborating with medical experts to build a robust argument that effectively supports our clients' cases.
Because hospitals in Philadelphia employ both staff physicians and independent contractors, determining liability requires careful legal and factual analysis. Edelstein Martin & Nelson has decades of experience handling these institutional claims and navigating the corporate structures that shield large healthcare systems.
When a nurse employed by a hospital commits an error, the hospital may be held vicariously liable under Pennsylvania's vicarious liability doctrine, which holds employers accountable for their employees' negligent acts performed within the scope of their job duties.
In conclusion, our firm acknowledges that pharmacists and pharmacies are vital to healthcare, serving as accessible care points and trusted sources of medication. Their dedication to patient education and safety enhances community health and strengthens the patient-provider relationship. As we navigate modern medicine, we believe the role of pharmacists will continue to grow, ensuring individuals receive the comprehensive care they deserve.
Pennsylvania law requires expert witnesses to link the defendant's conduct to the patient's harm. The expert must share the same or a similar speciality as the defendant and testify about how the standard of care was violated.
At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we recognize the critical importance of proving that a healthcare provider's breach of duty directly caused the injury. It's not enough to demonstrate negligence; we understand the necessity of establishing a clear connection between the provider's actions and the patient's harm. Our experienced team is dedicated to working diligently with medical experts to build a compelling case, ensuring that we effectively demonstrate that "but for" the provider's error, the injury would not have occurred. This aspect of a malpractice case can often be the most challenging, but we are committed to advocating fiercely for our clients to achieve justice.
Hospitals and healthcare corporations are often liable for more than just employee mistakes. Attorneys investigate institutional practices such as inadequate training, poor supervision, or equipment failures that contributed to harm.
Filing a medical malpractice claim in Pennsylvania can be overwhelming due to strict deadlines and the need for expert testimony. At Edelstein Martin & Nelson, we understand these challenges and are here to guide you every step of the way. Our dedicated attorneys will thoroughly investigate what went wrong and work tirelessly to pursue the full compensation you deserve.
Each case begins with a thorough evaluation of medical records and ends with either a negotiated resolution or a trial before a Philadelphia jury.
The first stage in any malpractice case is determining whether negligence occurred. Pennsylvania law requires proof that a medical professional breached the standard of care, directly causing injury or death.
At our firm, we start by gathering all pertinent records, including hospital charts, lab reports, diagnostic imaging, and physician notes. We then collaborate with medical experts to assess whether the healthcare provider's actions deviated from accepted standards of care.
Because of extensive local experience, attorneys understand how to analyze documentation from leading hospitals like Jefferson, Penn Medicine, and Temple University Health. They also know what details to look for, such as chart inconsistencies, altered records, or unexplained medication changes, that might indicate negligence.
Pennsylvania law requires every plaintiff filing a medical malpractice claim to submit a Certificate of Merit under Pa. R.C.P. 1042.3. This document certifies that a qualified medical expert has reviewed the case and believes there is a reasonable probability that the defendant's care fell below professional standards.
At our firm, we recognize that establishing a strong case involves demonstrating that the healthcare provider's breach of duty directly caused the injury. We understand that it is not sufficient to merely prove negligence; we must clearly connect that breach to the patient's harm. Our experienced team at Edelstein Martin & Nelson works diligently to illustrate that "but for" the provider's error, the damage would not have occurred. We know this aspect is often among the most contested in a malpractice case, and we are committed to collaborating with experts to build a robust argument on behalf of our clients.
Failing to properly file a Certificate of Merit within 60 days of the complaint can result in the case being thrown out entirely.
Once expert support is secured, the firm formally files a complaint in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. The complaint outlines the facts of the case, identifies the negligent parties, and specifies the damages sought.
Filing must occur within two years of the date of injury, as required by 42 Pa. C.S. § 5524(2), unless the injury was not immediately discoverable. In discovery rule cases, such as delayed cancer diagnosis, plaintiffs have two years from the date they reasonably should have discovered the harm.
At our firm, we have a deep familiarity with local civil procedure rules and court systems throughout Philadelphia, Montgomery, Bucks, Delaware, and Chester Counties. Our team is well-versed in navigating these areas to represent our clients’ interests effectively.
During discovery, both sides exchange information, evidence, and witness testimony. This is often the most intensive part of the process. Attorneys conduct depositions of doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, and experts in related fields.
They review thousands of pages of records and electronic data to uncover patterns of negligence, such as failure to monitor post-surgery patient vitals, medication administration errors documented in shift notes, and ignored test results or misfiled lab reports.
In many cases, discovery reveals institutional failures, like inadequate staff training or unsanitary facility conditions, that point to broader corporate negligence.
Not all medical malpractice cases go to trial. Once evidence is fully developed, parties may attempt to settle through direct negotiation or mediation. Edelstein Martin & Nelson leverages its reputation and case preparation to secure strong settlement offers.
Hospitals and insurers recognize that the firm's attorneys are seasoned trial advocates who will not hesitate to take a case to court if a fair resolution is not offered. Typical settlements may include damages for past and future medical expenses, lost income and diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium.
When settlement negotiations fail to deliver justice, attorneys are fully prepared to present the case before a jury. At trial, both sides present evidence, examine witnesses, and rely heavily on expert testimony.
At our firm, we excel at simplifying complex medical evidence for jurors. We use demonstrative exhibits, medical illustrations, and digital recreations of procedures to enhance understanding. In the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, where juries demand clarity, we connect expert analysis to compelling human stories, delivering persuasive courtroom presentations that resonate.
Calculating actual damages requires careful analysis and experienced legal advocacy.
Economic damages represent measurable financial losses tied to the injury. Victims of malpractice frequently face lifelong treatment needs, including additional surgeries, physical therapy, medication, and long-term nursing care.
Economic damages may cover hospitalization and surgical expenses, prescription medications and medical equipment, rehabilitation and home healthcare, and anticipated future medical care. Attorneys often collaborate with healthcare economists to project long-term medical costs.
When an injury prevents a patient from returning to work or limits their future earning potential, compensation may include lost wages and loss of earning potential. Vocational and financial assessments demonstrate the extent to which malpractice affects a client's career and economic security.
Non-economic damages compensate victims for physical and emotional pain caused by medical negligence. This includes chronic pain, loss of mobility, or diminished enjoyment of life. Attorneys know how to convey the depth of a client's suffering through medical evidence and personal testimony.
Emotional trauma is common after medical errors. Patients may develop anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder. Many are unable to return to activities or hobbies they once loved. The firm ensures these intangible losses are valued entirely when negotiating settlements or presenting to juries.
When malpractice affects family relationships, such as loss of intimacy or companionship, spouses may also recover damages. These claims are significant in cases involving catastrophic or permanent injury.
When negligence results in death, Pennsylvania's Wrongful Death Act (42 Pa. C.S. § 8301) allows surviving spouses, children, or parents to recover for funeral and burial costs, loss of income and household services, and loss of companionship and emotional support.
In addition to wrongful death claims, the Survival Act (42 Pa. C.S. § 8302) allows the deceased's estate to recover damages the victim could have claimed if they had lived. These may include medical bills and pain and suffering before death.
Edelstein Martin & Nelson often pursues both wrongful death and survival claims simultaneously, ensuring every avenue of recovery is explored.
In rare cases, Pennsylvania courts may award punitive damages to punish particularly reckless or egregious conduct. Examples include intentional falsification of records, gross negligence in patient monitoring, or surgical errors committed under the influence of substances.
While punitive damages are not guaranteed, attorneys have successfully argued for enhanced awards in cases where healthcare providers showed extreme disregard for patient safety.
Every client receives individual attention from seasoned trial lawyers who understand the emotional toll of medical negligence. Whether a claim involves a botched surgery in Northeast Philadelphia or a medication error in Chester County, clients can expect thorough preparation, honesty, and unwavering advocacy.
Our firm's local knowledge proves invaluable when navigating Philadelphia's healthcare community, which includes some of the nation's largest hospital networks and teaching institutions. Understanding their structure, insurance coverage, and risk management policies provides a distinct advantage.
Avoid discussing the incident with insurance representatives without legal advice. Contact a qualified medical malpractice lawyer as soon as possible to protect your rights.
Time is critical in these cases. Victims or families can contact Edelstein Martin & Nelson by calling 1-888-630-4409 for a free, confidential case evaluation, with no attorney fees unless compensation is recovered. The firm's attorneys are available to answer questions and start building a strong case for justice.
Address
123 S Broad St #1820
Philadelphia, PA 19109
Email: lnelson@law-pa.com
Edelstein Martin & Nelson Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | © Copyright | All Rights Reserved.
